![]() ![]() ![]() The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD.McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE., Jr Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, Pollard WE, Gilson BS, Morris JR.Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.6M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Full textįull text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the use of the acute form in its intended applications however, further research is required to document the generalizability of greater sensitivity of the acute form to recent changes in health and to explore whether norms based on the standard can be used to interpret the acute scale scores. The data indicated that while the acute form was more sensitive than the standard to change in health status associated with changes in acute symptoms, acute scale scores may not be comparable to national norms based on the standard, particularly for those scales that assess frequency of health events during a specified time period. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The acute form yielded high-quality data scales conformed to the assumptions of the summated ratings method used to score the standard SF-36 and scales had good distributional properties, were reliable, and had a factor content similar to the standard. ![]() DATA COLLECTION: The SF-36 was self-administered at the time of a clinic visit (before clinical examination) to synchronize with clinical measures of disease severity at three different time points during the clinical trial: -2 weeks (two weeks before randomization to treatment), baseline (week 0 or randomization), and +4 weeks (four weeks after baseline). DATA SOURCES: SF-36 data collected from 142 participants (60% female, average age 39) in a clinical trial of an asthma medication: 74 patients randomized to the acute form and 68 to the standard. The SF-12 is an even shorter - 1 page, 2 minute - survey form that has been shown to yield summary physical and mental health outcome scores that are interchangeable with those from the SF-36.OBJECTIVE: To compare the measurement properties of acute (one-week recall) and standard (four-week recall) versions of SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scale scores. Administration time is about 10-12 minutes. ![]() Accordingly, the SF-36 has proven useful in surveys of general and specific populations, comparing the relative burden of diseases, and in differentiating the health benefits produced by a wide range of different treatments. It is used to measure observable and tangible limitations due to poor health and/or bodily pain in physical, social, and role activities. It is a generic measure of perceived health status, as opposed to one that targets a specific age, disease, or treatment group. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with only 36 questions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |